Yesterday afternoon I was back to volunteering my shift at the Lodestar Day Resource Center (LDRC) after missing two weeks due to being in Vancouver and having company in town. It was such a nice day out that for just about half of my time there, mostly everyone was outside so I didn’t have anyone reading. On top of it, the typical top 20 hits that plays on Sundays was replaced by love ballads and elevator music. I needed something to keep my eyes from closing.
I started to read Freakonomics, which I had started on the flight to Vancouver but never finished. I have had it awhile and just never bothered to pick it up and read it until a few weeks ago. Shortly after I started reading it, a man inquired as to what I was reading. After I read the title he asked if he could look at it, to which I gladly agreed. I’ve never had anyone inquire about the books I bring in, which is half the point of bringing them. I rarely read while I’m there; they’re there to start conversation. It worked this time.
The man looked at the cover and then read the description/synopsis on the jacket. He proceeded to read the table of contents and then browse a few chapters, which I’m assuming are ones that looked interested based on their titles. After about 10 minutes he returned it. I asked him if he wanted to borrow it and he looked surprised and then started giggling some. Of course, I was extremely curious by this time so I pressed him as to what was funny about my asking if he wanted to borrow the book.
He then proceeded to discuss his thoughts on the book. He said while many of the chapters seemed interesting and did raise points that deserved to be addressed, that much of it seemed pretty exaggerated, such as the chapter on drug dealers. He began to discuss with me how flawed research is and how it is skewed to the needs of the researcher. We talked for awhile in regards to what is the right question to ask, and if there is truly one “right” question, or just the right question at the right time for the right results. This conversation led to how this is relevant in the news and today’s media and how the right answer is never found by looking at one source, but rather by evaluating multiple sources, especially ones overseas. One of the examples he gave was when companies announce they are laying off, say 1,000 people. According to him, what is not mentioned is that of that 1,000, 400 are jobs were really requisitions the company had open that they are no longer going to fill, and another 300 or so typically are jobs not in the US.
It was so interesting to be involved in a discussion on user research and asking the right questions. Even more so, if there ever really is a “right question.” Is there ever a right question, or only one right question? The question is typically something asked that helps solve the issue, but how do you ever know if you are truly solving the issue? Questions like this are so key in user experience and in making sure the needs of the true user are met and not just the needs of the stakeholders.